Continuing to browse our website indicates your consent to our use of cookies. For more information, see our Privacy policy.

Trade policy

Weaponizing Trade: The US sets a dangerous precedent with Brazil tariffs


Published 15 July 2025

Trump's 50% tariff move against Brazil, ostensibly justified on the basis of US "interests" but motivated more by his personal dissatisfaction with the treatment of his ally former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, threatens global norms and undermines democracy.

In a move as audacious as it is alarming, President Donald Trump’s 9 July letter announcing a 50% tariff on all Brazilian imports marks a deeply troubling shift in the use of trade policy as a tool of political coercion. Ostensibly justified on the basis of US "interests," the action represents an unprecedented breach of international trade norms, motivated not by economic grievance but by a thinly veiled desire to influence the domestic political landscape of another sovereign state.

Trump’s justification, his personal dissatisfaction with the treatment of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, transforms a standard trade instrument into a weapon of political retaliation. This is not a dispute over tariffs, non-tariffs, subsidies, or dumping. It is a direct attempt to pressure Brazil’s judiciary and shape its internal political outcomes. Such a move goes far beyond accepted practice and threatens the very foundation of the global trading system.

Related Article

Liberation Day Round 2: The uncertainty continues

The World Trade Organization was created to provide a rules-based framework for resolving trade disagreements. While not without flaws, it remains the best available multilateral mechanism for addressing legitimate economic concerns. Circumventing this system to target a nation’s internal judicial actions defies the spirit — and the letter — of that rules-based order. It encourages tit-for-tat reprisals, undermines predictability, and casts a long shadow over international economic cooperation.

Many have rightly described this move as setting a "scary precedent." If powerful economies begin using trade as leverage over non-trade matters, whether political trials, human rights policies, or environmental regulations, it invites a chaotic world in which access to markets is no longer governed by fair competition but by ideological alignment or political subservience. In such a world, the global economy becomes hostage to political caprice.

The United States has long positioned itself as a champion of democracy and self-determination. Yet these tariffs send a very different message, that democratic institutions are only to be respected when they deliver outcomes approved by Washington. By attempting to punish Brazil for allowing its courts to operate independently, the US risks eroding its own credibility and moral authority in defending the democratic process worldwide.

The economic consequences will also be significant. For Brazil, these sweeping tariffs could severely damage export industries, further strain its economy, and alienate a historically important trading partner. For US businesses and consumers, the result will be higher prices, disrupted supply chains, and mounting uncertainty. More broadly, this action contributes to a growing mistrust between nations, weakening the very cooperation needed to address shared global challenges, from climate change to security.

Related Article

Breaking down US$450 billion of trade destruction from US tariffs

What is unfolding is not global leadership; it is the behavior of an autocracy. Using trade policy to strong-arm sovereign nations into political compliance betrays the values of a democratic society. It also miscalculates the long-term costs. Other countries are watching. And they are learning that trade relations with the United States may be subject not to law or economic principle, but to the shifting winds of political grievance. In an interconnected world, stability in trade relations is a public good.

Undermining it for short-term political theatrics does not make America stronger. It makes the global system weaker—and the US less trusted within it.


Merle A. Hinrich has dedicated his 60-year career to promoting global trade, as the Founder and Executive Chairman of Global Sources, and as the Chairman of the Hinrich Foundation. His work is driven by the belief that sustainable and mutually beneficial global trade can bring stability in international relations and growth.

Articles by this expert

View bio

Have any feedback on this article?

contact us

BACK TO TOP